Real Estate Management of Key West LLC
Property Management · Key West, FL
About
RealReviews profileReal Estate Management of Key West is a locally owned Key West company at 3706 North Roosevelt Boulevard that publishes home-watch, long-term rental, HOA and condominium, accounting, inspection, emergency-contact, and vendor-oversight services. The official material supports a monitoring and management model, but owners should separate work the company observes or coordinates from licensed trade work and obtain the actual checklist, authority limits, reporting cadence, fees, and contract exit terms.
Real Estate Management of Key West LLC: what to know
RealReviews editorial research · checked 2026-07-26Real Estate Management of Key West has a credible published fit for home watch, longer-term rental management, HOA or condominium administration, and local vendor coordination. It should not be treated as a complete vacation-rental booking and revenue operator on the evidence reviewed here. The useful comparison is therefore not one broad property-management label. It is whether REMKW can produce the right record for the owner's actual job: a visit report for a closed house, an owner ledger for a rental, or a board package for an association.
The public record resolves the company, not the contract
The official contact material identifies Real Estate Management of Key West LLC at 3706 N. Roosevelt Boulevard, Suite 207, with 305-432-6373 as its phone number. It names Wade J. Meyer as owner and broker and publishes BK3275505 and CAM50678. Those details are unusually helpful for resolving which Key West company this profile covers. They also explain why the site discusses brokerage, association management, inspections, accounting, tenants, emergency contact, and vendor oversight on the same domain.
Identity is not the same as current authority. Search Florida DBPR for Wade J. Meyer or BK3275505 and for CAM50678 on the day the agreement is signed, then keep the dated result. Match the broker record to brokerage duties and the community-association-manager record to association duties. Neither identifier makes REMKW the licensed performer of every repair it may observe or coordinate.
The service pages are less complete on deliverables and price. They describe a customized home-watch checklist, reporting, repair monitoring, and a local emergency contact, but they do not display the checklist, a sample report, a management agreement, a fee schedule, or an exit package. Those are not minor missing details. They are the documents that show whether a remote owner can audit the work after handing over access and limited spending authority.
Follow one house problem all the way back to the owner
Consider a ceiling stain discovered while an owner is away. A useful REMKW visit record would show when the inspector entered, what changed from the prior visit, and what happened next. The manager may photograph the mark, contact the owner, admit another company, collect an estimate, and return after the repair. The file should make that chain legible without requiring the owner to rebuild it from scattered messages.
That example also draws the trade boundary. Observing a leak or monitoring a repair does not establish authority to diagnose or perform plumbing, electrical, HVAC, roofing, structural, mold, or other regulated work. The separately identified contractor belongs on the estimate and invoice, with the owner's approval and the applicable credential and insurance evidence. REMKW's own charge for access, coordination, or follow-up should be visible rather than folded into an unexplained total.
Ask for one redacted report, then buy one ordinary visit before entering a long route agreement. There is no reason to stage a defect. A known sticky door, warm room, or aging condensate line is enough to see whether the report distinguishes a condition from an exception and gives an open item a next owner. The same conversation should resolve who visits when the regular inspector is unavailable and what happens when storm restrictions delay access.
Keep the report outside any provider portal. A home-watch history becomes more valuable after several months because it shows changes, repeated exceptions, and unresolved work. It should survive a manager change or contract ending.
A rental, an association, and a closed house need different math
Home watch can be normalized without inventing a Key West market average. Weekly service creates 52 scheduled visits a year, biweekly service 26, and monthly service 12. If an owner is away from June through November and chooses biweekly service, the base line is 13 visits. The proposal can then place storm checks, exception trips, vendor access, repair monitoring, and after-hours response beside that base instead of hiding them inside a vague monthly figure.
A long-term rental has a different cost record. Request a redacted monthly owner statement beside a maintenance invoice. Those two documents should let the owner trace collected rent, the management charge, reserve movements, repair cost, any coordination markup, and disbursement timing. Leasing and renewal charges belong in the same twelve-month view only when the scenario includes those events.
An association board should not be shown either of those files as proof of fit. Ask for a redacted board package that connects a decision to its budget line and resulting vendor work. Base meetings and financial reporting can then be separated from event-driven charges such as an extra meeting, records production, a violation matter, emergency coordination, procurement, or major-project oversight.
Read the exit while comparing the price. The agreement should say what happens to owner or association funds, deposits, keys and codes, tenant or association records, open work, vendor balances, and portal exports after notice is given. Require a dated final accounting. The outside rating displayed on RealReviews remains attributed to its original source; for this decision, a reference from an owner using the same service line is more informative than the aggregate number alone.
Services listed
4 sourcedEvidence checked for Real Estate Management of Key West LLC
Sources and update dates- Editorial research checked 2026-07-26
- 5 approved source records
- Google Places snapshot checked May 2026
Source records explain what is known about Real Estate Management of Key West LLC; firsthand customer accounts remain in their own section. If a business fact has changed, send the newer record through the correction link.
Request management proposal with Real Estate Management of Key West LLC
Request a property-management proposalTell us what you need from Real Estate Management of Key West LLC, where the work is, and when it matters. The request keeps the reply easy to compare with another provider.
Firsthand customer feedback
Open for genuine experiencesIf you hired this business, describe the job and what happened. Add timing or price context only when you can share it; every submission is reviewed before publication.
Sourced business themes
5 themes from attributed profile dataQuestions to ask before hiring
Ask a questionPeople also compare
Nearby profilesControls for Real Estate Management of Key West LLC's profile
Sources, ownership, and correctionsKeep the hiring record
Save the written scope and warranty with the quote. A correction changes the public profile only after review; an owner claim does not erase criticism or control customer submissions.
RealReviews records the selected request details. The business still confirms availability, price, and acceptance.
